From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] team: update master carrier state Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:15:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20130103.021535.1980763300980291186.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20121230214723.GD1575@minipsycho.orion> <20121230220616.GA2065@obelix.rh> <20121230221052.GF1575@minipsycho.orion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: jiri@resnulli.us Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:50250 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753073Ab3ACKPg (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 05:15:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121230221052.GF1575@minipsycho.orion> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jiri Pirko Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:10:52 +0100 > Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:06:16PM CET, fbl@redhat.com wrote: >>On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:47:23PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >>> Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 07:27:29PM CET, fbl@redhat.com wrote: >>> >Update master's carrier state when there is any >>> >change with its ports. >>> >>> >>> This patch looks good to me. Just one nitpick I spotted.... >>> >>> >+ bool team_linkup; >>> >+ >>> >+ team_linkup = false; >>> >>> >>> This can be squashed together. >> >>Ok, but that increases the static size of the module because it >>moves the variable out of bss. >> >>I have no strong opinion on either case, so it's up to you. > > Ok :) > > Acked-by: Jiri Pirko Applied.