From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:46:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20130108.174601.1788895671912734725.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20130109002110.GB5296@kroah.com> <20130108.173056.1029788106028104571.davem@davemloft.net> <1683801.VNKd61ZM1Q@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pv-drivers@vmware.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: dtor@vmware.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1683801.VNKd61ZM1Q@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Dmitry Torokhov Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:41:44 -0800 > On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 05:30:56 PM David Miller wrote: >> From: Greg KH >> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:21:10 -0800 >> >> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:59:08PM -0800, George Zhang wrote: >> >> * * * >> >> >> >> This series of VSOCK linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from >> >> VMware to address Greg's and all other's code review comments. >> > >> > Dave, you acked these patches a while ago, >> >> Really? I'd like to see where I did that. >> >> Instead, what I remember doing was deferring to the feedback these >> folks received, stating that ideas that the virtio people had >> mentioned should be considered instead. >> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=135301515818462&w=2 > > I believe Andy replied to Anthony's AF_VMCHANNEL post and the differences > between the proposed solutions. I'd much rather see a hypervisor neutral solution than a hypervisor specific one which this certainly is.