From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois Romieu Subject: Re: r8169 rx_missed increasing in bursts (regression) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:53:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20130115225316.GA924@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <20130108102814.7abe8c08@vostro> <20130108225833.GA4193@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20130109115850.055b7a7e@vostro> <20130109191456.0888ac75@vostro> <20130115101114.0a59a7cb@vostro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Timo Teras Return-path: Received: from violet.fr.zoreil.com ([92.243.8.30]:41204 "EHLO violet.fr.zoreil.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933835Ab3AOXVu (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:21:50 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130115101114.0a59a7cb@vostro> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Timo Teras : [...] > Would it be feasible to make the fifo size a module parameter, or > somehow autotuned according to available system memory? If by fifo size you mean descriptor ring size, I can do it through ethtool. > I also noticed that since recent commits, the dirty_rx is always > identical cur_rx. Basically, dirty_rx can be just removed. Should I > send a patch for this? Yes, please. -- Ueimor