From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:50:05 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20130118.145005.156366015893075594.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20130116062104.GA18940@secunet.com>
	<396283550.90353.1358537733820.JavaMail.root@elliptictech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: steffen.klassert@secunet.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: tstdenis@elliptictech.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <396283550.90353.1358537733820.JavaMail.root@elliptictech.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@elliptictech.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:35:33 -0500 (EST)

> Any "maintainers" going to reply to this at all?  

What do you mean?  There was a reply, and the reply if someone
so skilled finds this facility useful they can feel free to
submit an implementation.

You can't force people to work on something they have no interest
in, especially when it's effectively a new feature.