From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] NTB: correct missing readq/writeq errors Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:40:05 -0800 Message-ID: <20130120234005.GA14196@kroah.com> References: <1358586155-23322-1-git-send-email-jon.mason@intel.com> <1358586155-23322-2-git-send-email-jon.mason@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jiang , Nicholas Bellinger To: Jon Mason Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1358586155-23322-2-git-send-email-jon.mason@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 02:02:15AM -0700, Jon Mason wrote: > Atomic readq and writeq do not exist by default on some 32bit > architectures, thus causing compile errors due to non-existent symbols. > In those cases, use the definitions of those symbols from > include/asm-generic/io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h > > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason > --- > drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c > index 4c71b17..0b46fef 100644 > --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c > +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ > * Contact Information: > * Jon Mason > */ > +#include Really? This seems really odd. Usually we just don't build the code for any platform that doesn't have readq/writeq. Otherwise, shouldn't those arches just include this file themselves to keep everything working? Individual drivers shouldn't have to do this. So, I'm not going to take this one just yet, sorry. greg k-h