From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] NTB: Update Version Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:47:14 -0800 Message-ID: <20130120234714.GA21708@kroah.com> References: <1358586155-23322-1-git-send-email-jon.mason@intel.com> <1358586155-23322-16-git-send-email-jon.mason@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jiang , Nicholas Bellinger To: Jon Mason Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1358586155-23322-16-git-send-email-jon.mason@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 02:02:29AM -0700, Jon Mason wrote: > Update NTB version to 0.25 > > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason > --- > drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c > index b792ccd..df86882 100644 > --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c > +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ > #include "ntb_regs.h" > > #define NTB_NAME "Intel(R) PCI-E Non-Transparent Bridge Driver" > -#define NTB_VER "0.24" > +#define NTB_VER "0.25" I'm not objecting to this, but in the end, does it really matter? Why not just stick with whatever kernel version you are using? Keeping this up to date is going to be hard over the long haul, right? thanks, greg k-h