From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: steffen.klassert@secunet.com
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request (net-next): ipsec-next 2013-01-23
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:00:58 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130123.140058.1653306473705960117.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358929144-17806-1-git-send-email-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:18:56 +0100
> 1) Add a statistic counter for invalid output states and
> remove a superfluous state valid check, from Li RongQing.
>
> 2) Probe for asynchronous block ciphers instead of synchronous block
> ciphers to make the asynchronous variants available even if no
> synchronous block ciphers are found, from Jussi Kivilinna.
>
> 3) Make rfc3686 asynchronous block cipher and make use of
> the new asynchronous variant, from Jussi Kivilinna.
>
> 4) Replace some rwlocks by rcu, from Cong Wang.
>
> 5) Remove some unused defines.
>
> Please pull or let me know if there are problems.
Pulled, thanks Steffen.
I hope Herbert is ok with the small crypto bits going in this way,
since they really are IPSEC specific.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-23 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 8:18 pull request (net-next): ipsec-next 2013-01-23 Steffen Klassert
2013-01-23 8:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfrm: removes a superfluous check and add a statistic Steffen Klassert
2013-01-23 8:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfrm_algo: probe asynchronous block ciphers instead of synchronous Steffen Klassert
2013-01-23 8:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] crypto: ctr - make rfc3686 asynchronous block cipher Steffen Klassert
2013-01-23 8:19 ` [PATCH 4/8] crypto: aesni-intel - remove rfc3686(ctr(aes)), utilize rfc3686 from ctr-module instead Steffen Klassert
2013-01-23 8:19 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfrm: replace rwlock on xfrm_state_afinfo with rcu Steffen Klassert
2013-01-23 8:19 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfrm: replace rwlock on xfrm_km_list " Steffen Klassert
2013-01-23 8:19 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfrm: use separated locks to protect pointers of struct xfrm_state_afinfo Steffen Klassert
2013-01-23 8:19 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfrm: Remove unused defines Steffen Klassert
2013-01-23 19:00 ` David Miller [this message]
2013-01-23 21:23 ` pull request (net-next): ipsec-next 2013-01-23 Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130123.140058.1653306473705960117.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).