From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tuntap: reduce memory using of queues
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:16:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130123151627.GB1613@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358949553-30309-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 09:59:12PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> A MAX_TAP_QUEUES(1024) queues of tuntap device is always allocated
> unconditionally even userspace only requires a single queue device. This is
> unnecessary and will lead a very high order of page allocation when has a high
> possibility to fail. Solving this by creating a one queue net device when
> userspace only use one queue and also reduce MAX_TAP_QUEUES to
> DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES which can guarantee the success of
> the allocation.
>
> Reported-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Note: this is a 3.8 patch, it fixes a regression.
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/tun.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index c81680d..8939d21 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -109,11 +109,10 @@ struct tap_filter {
> unsigned char addr[FLT_EXACT_COUNT][ETH_ALEN];
> };
>
> -/* 1024 is probably a high enough limit: modern hypervisors seem to support on
> - * the order of 100-200 CPUs so this leaves us some breathing space if we want
> - * to match a queue per guest CPU.
> - */
> -#define MAX_TAP_QUEUES 1024
> +/* DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES were choosed to let the rx/tx queues allocated for
> + * the netdevice to be fit in one page. So we can make sure the success of
> + * memory allocation. TODO: increase the limit. */
> +#define MAX_TAP_QUEUES DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES
>
> #define TUN_FLOW_EXPIRE (3 * HZ)
>
> @@ -1583,6 +1582,8 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct net *net, struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr)
> else {
> char *name;
> unsigned long flags = 0;
> + int queues = ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_MULTI_QUEUE ?
> + MAX_TAP_QUEUES : 1;
>
> if (!ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> return -EPERM;
> @@ -1606,8 +1607,8 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct net *net, struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr)
> name = ifr->ifr_name;
>
> dev = alloc_netdev_mqs(sizeof(struct tun_struct), name,
> - tun_setup,
> - MAX_TAP_QUEUES, MAX_TAP_QUEUES);
> + tun_setup, queues, queues);
> +
> if (!dev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> --
> 1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-23 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 13:59 [PATCH 1/2] tuntap: reduce memory using of queues Jason Wang
2013-01-23 13:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] tuntap: limit the number of flow caches Jason Wang
2013-01-23 18:50 ` David Miller
2013-01-24 3:22 ` Jason Wang
2013-01-23 15:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-01-23 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] tuntap: reduce memory using of queues David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130123151627.GB1613@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).