From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Madore Subject: assigning an entire subnet of addresses to an interface Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 21:51:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20130203205124.GA13738@aldebaran.madore.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: Linux Netdev Mailing-List Return-path: Received: from achernar.gro-tsen.net ([88.191.144.68]:41898 "EHLO achernar.gro-tsen.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753589Ab3BCVAb (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:00:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Dear list, Is there a way to assign an entire subnet of (typically IPv6) addresses to an interface? For example, I'd like to assign the entire 2001:db8:f00f::/48 prefix to eth42 without actually running 2^80 separate "ip addr add" commands. I'm aware that (with sufficiently recent kernels) one can do this: ip -6 route add local 2001:db8:f00f::/48 dev lo - which will cause packets received for any address in this subnet to be handled locally. But that doesn't really answer my question, because this does not allow local processes to bind to any desired address in the subnet (e.g., running "socat 'TCP6-LISTEN:9876,bind=3D[2001:db8:f00f::3141:5926]'" fails with EADDRNOTAVAIL). Now apparently Linux _does_ have features which allow a process to bind to any desired address in a subnet, since this is the case for the IPv4 127.0.0.0/8 standard loopback (I can run "socat 'TCP-LISTEN:9876,bind=3D[127.1.2.3]' -" without error). In a na=EFve move, I tried to reproduce the output of ip addr show for the 127.0.0.0/8 subnet as input, but failed (there's an extra word "lo" in the output that ip does not allow back as input). Is this because this subnet is really magical to the kernel, or because ip input parsing is incomplete, or for some other reason? If the feature is not presently available in Linux, is there some hope that it eventually will be? How hard would it be to add it? Thanks in advance, --=20 David A. Madore ( http://www.madore.org/~david/ )