From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] skbuff: create skb_panic() to let caller specify panic Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:52:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20130211.135227.648991997734970671.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1360484610-11432-1-git-send-email-sakiwit@gmail.com> <20130210182451.GA1602@minipsycho.orion> <20130210234651.GD2496@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: sakiwit@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:40997 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759586Ab3BKSwa (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:52:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130210234651.GD2496@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jean Sacren Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 16:46:52 -0700 > From: Jiri Pirko > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:24:51 +0100 >> >> How about to leave skb_under_panic() and skb_over_panic() wrapping >> functions there just to wrap "skb_panic(skb, sz, addr, __func__);" call? >> >> Seems nice that to state the name in str... > > That's really a good idea. If David drops again, I'll implement it. I like Jiri's idea, please implement it.