From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: [PATCH] bridge: set priority of STP packets Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:22:22 -0800 Message-ID: <20130211102222.37743b22@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:38129 "EHLO mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758777Ab3BKSWh (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:22:37 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id hz10so3188425pad.21 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:22:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Spanning Tree Protocol packets should have always been marked as control packets, this causes them to get queued in the high prirority FIFO. As Radia Perlman mentioned in her LCA talk, STP dies if bridge gets overloaded and can't communicate. This is a long-standing bug back to the first versions of Linux bridge. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger --- Please consider adding to stable as well. --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c 2013-01-16 09:47:00.599539375 -0800 +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c 2013-02-11 08:13:56.315979316 -0800 @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ static void br_send_bpdu(struct net_brid skb->dev = p->dev; skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_802_2); + skb->priority = TC_PRIO_CONTROL; skb_reserve(skb, LLC_RESERVE); memcpy(__skb_put(skb, length), data, length);