From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: tap devices not receiving packets from a bridge Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:54:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20130212095422.GA23270@redhat.com> References: <50AE36E0.8000307@dlhnet.de> <20121123070211.GC22787@stefanha-thinkpad.hitronhub.home> <20121123110146.GC7051@redhat.com> <50FE5607.9020405@dlhnet.de> <20130123100312.GA8108@redhat.com> <5119E9DC.3000505@dlhnet.de> <20130212090850.GB22029@redhat.com> <056542E4-18E4-4C9F-AC96-60661768D6AF@dlhnet.de> <511A0DBB.7080907@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Peter Lieven , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Tokarev Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <511A0DBB.7080907@msgid.tls.msk.ru> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 12.02.2013 13:10, Peter Lieven wrote: > [] > > Guys, can we please trim the excessive quoting just a bit? ;) > > >>> If have set this option for 2 weeks now and not seen this problem again. > >>> How does this flag work with the recently added tap multiqueue support? > > >>This will be the only option in 3.8. > > >Ok, but wouldn`t it be good to set it in qemu for kernels <3.8? > > I'd say for kernels without mq support, not for <3.8, right? :) > > Thanks, > > /mjt It's harmless to always set this flag, on 3.8 it does nothing. -- MST