From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 net-next 00/12] VLAN filtering/VLAN aware
	bridge
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:48:45 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20130213.144845.380703713884877807.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1360777309-25522-1-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com>
	<20130213.140851.2190933816965797127.davem@davemloft.net>
	<511BECC7.4040406@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: vyasevic@redhat.com
Return-path: <bridge-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <511BECC7.4040406@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bridge>,
	<mailto:bridge-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bridge/>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge>,
	<mailto:bridge-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: bridge-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: bridge-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:43:03 -0500

> On 02/13/2013 02:08 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
>> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:41:37 -0500
>>
>>> Changes since v9:
>>> * series re-ordering so make functionality more distinct.  Basic vlan
>>>    filtering is patches 1-4.  Support for PVID/untagged vlans is patches
>>>    5 and 6.  VLAN support for FDB/MDB is patches 7-11.  Patch 12 is
>>>    still additional egress policy.
>>> * Slight simplification to code that extracts the VID from skb.  Since
>>> * we
>>>    now depend on the vlan module, at the time of input skb_tci is
>>>    guaranteed
>>>    to be set if the packet had 8021q header.  We can simply refere to it.
>>> * Changed the opaque 'parent' pointer from prior patches to a union so
>>> * we
>>>    can be much more explicit in our assignments.
>>> * Lots of additional testing with STP turned on.  No issues were
>>> * observed.
>>
>> Thanks a lot for keeping this series uptodate Vlad.
>>
>> Stephen, I think this series is ready, anything needed to be fixed
>> still
>> can be follow-on patches.  Agreed?
> 
> Looks like there are 2 more drivers that need to be update for
> ndo_fdb_del.  I'll rebase and re-spin.

Ok.