From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: steffen.klassert@secunet.com
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request (net-next): ipsec-next 2013-02-14
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:30:45 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130214.133045.921192511470923993.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360842447-3344-1-git-send-email-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:47:20 +0100
> 1) Remove a duplicated call to skb_orphan() in pf_key, from Cong Wang.
>
> 2) Prepare xfrm and pf_key for algorithms without pf_key support,
> from Jussi Kivilinna.
>
> 3) Fix an unbalanced lock in xfrm_output_one(), from Li RongQing.
>
> 4) Add an IPsec state resolution packet queue to handle
> packets that are send before the states are resolved.
>
> 5) xfrm4_policy_fini() is unused since 2.6.11, time to remove it.
> From Michal Kubecek.
>
> 6) The xfrm gc threshold was configurable just in the initial
> namespace, make it configurable in all namespaces. From
> Michal Kubecek.
>
> 7) We currently can not insert policies with mark and mask
> such that some flows would be matched from both policies.
> Allow this if the priorities of these policies are different,
> the one with the higher priority is used in this case.
>
> Please pull or let me know if there are problems.
Pulled, thanks Steffen.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-14 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-14 11:47 pull request (net-next): ipsec-next 2013-02-14 Steffen Klassert
2013-02-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 1/7] af_key: remove a duplicated skb_orphan() Steffen Klassert
2013-02-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] pf_key/xfrm_algo: prepare pf_key and xfrm_algo for new algorithms without pfkey support Steffen Klassert
2013-02-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfrm: fix a unbalanced lock Steffen Klassert
2013-02-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfrm: Add a state resolution packet queue Steffen Klassert
2013-02-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfrm: remove unused xfrm4_policy_fini() Steffen Klassert
2013-02-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfrm: make gc_thresh configurable in all namespaces Steffen Klassert
2013-02-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfrm: Allow inserting policies with matching mark and different priorities Steffen Klassert
2013-02-14 18:30 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130214.133045.921192511470923993.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).