From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ipv6: use stronger hash for reassembly queue hash table
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 06:57:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130308055718.GA28531@order.stressinduktion.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130307214211.GP7941@order.stressinduktion.org>
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:42:11PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> ipv6_addr_hash can yield the exact same hash value for countless ip
> addresses from one /64 subnet. Let's make it a bit harder to create a
> long list of reassembly queues in the hash table by using a stronger hash.
>
> I spotted this just by looking at the source and did not verify if it
> is really the case, so this patch has RFC status. But the jhash change
> should not really hurt anyway. This patch is only compile tested.
Hmpf, I haven't seen Eric's change(279e9f2: ipv6: optimize
inet6_hash_frag()) and tried to compare a v3.8 against a net-next
kernel. At a first sight, it seems in some kind of denial of service
scenario the relative amount of time spend in inet_frag_find increased,
but I will do more comparable benchmarks later today (could be also
because of other changes). I just wanted to let you know that I will do
more research on this one and that you shouldn't apply this patch for now.
I also noticed that this function is also used by netfilter in the
forwarding path. Perhaps a jenkins hash on the destination address would
be better, too. Perhaps a netfilter specific hash function could also
be used.
Greetings,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-08 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-07 21:42 [PATCH RFC] ipv6: use stronger hash for reassembly queue hash table Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 5:57 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2013-03-08 13:04 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 14:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 15:08 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 15:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 15:54 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 16:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 16:18 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-09 15:19 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 20:53 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-13 1:27 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-13 1:31 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-13 5:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-14 1:37 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 4:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-03-14 7:14 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 9:47 ` David Laight
2013-03-14 10:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-14 12:34 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 7:10 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-03-14 7:23 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 7:28 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 9:18 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-03-14 12:45 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130308055718.GA28531@order.stressinduktion.org \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).