From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ncardwell@google.com
Cc: nanditad@google.com, ycheng@google.com, edumazet@google.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@cs.helsinki.fi,
therbert@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tcp: TLP loss detection.
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:45:22 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130312.084522.1295825068015762611.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQy=qG1-qQCrF9VhZr8yj1wd-C0F6AO1zW9QAkro-EqW4hw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:38:12 -0400
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com> wrote:
>> This is the second of the TLP patch series; it augments the basic TLP
>> algorithm with a loss detection scheme.
>>
>> This patch implements a mechanism for loss detection when a Tail
>> loss probe retransmission plugs a hole thereby masking packet loss
>> from the sender. The loss detection algorithm relies on counting
>> TLP dupacks as outlined in Sec. 3 of:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dukkipati-tcpm-tcp-loss-probe-01
>>
>> The basic idea is: Sender keeps track of TLP "episode" upon
>> retransmission of a TLP packet. An episode ends when the sender receives
>> an ACK above the SND.NXT (tracked by tlp_high_seq) at the time of the
>> episode. We want to make sure that before the episode ends the sender
>> receives a "TLP dupack", indicating that the TLP retransmission was
>> unnecessary, so there was no loss/hole that needed plugging. If the
>> sender gets no TLP dupack before the end of the episode, then it reduces
>> ssthresh and the congestion window, because the TLP packet arriving at
>> the receiver probably plugged a hole.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
>
> Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Also applied, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-12 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-11 20:00 [PATCH 1/2] tcp: Tail loss probe (TLP) Nandita Dukkipati
2013-03-11 20:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] tcp: TLP loss detection Nandita Dukkipati
2013-03-11 21:38 ` Neal Cardwell
2013-03-12 12:45 ` David Miller [this message]
2013-03-11 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] tcp: Tail loss probe (TLP) Neal Cardwell
2013-03-12 12:45 ` David Miller
2013-03-11 22:47 ` Yuchung Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130312.084522.1295825068015762611.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=nanditad@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).