From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ipv6: use stronger hash for reassembly queue hash table
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 02:31:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130313013101.GF14801@order.stressinduktion.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130313012715.GE14801@order.stressinduktion.org>
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:27:15AM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> Disable netfilter defragmenation for ipv6 on your machine if you test
> this patch, otherwise you won't see the improvment. Machine now runs
> smoothly under fragmentation dos.
Just to clarify:
When I wrote dos above, I actually meant a dos where the addresses have a
common ipv6_addr_hash. A simple test tool I wrote for testing is here:
https://gist.github.com/hannes/5116331
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-13 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-07 21:42 [PATCH RFC] ipv6: use stronger hash for reassembly queue hash table Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 5:57 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 13:04 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 14:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 15:08 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 15:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 15:54 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 16:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 16:18 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-09 15:19 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 20:53 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-13 1:27 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-13 1:31 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2013-03-13 5:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-14 1:37 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 4:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-03-14 7:14 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 9:47 ` David Laight
2013-03-14 10:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-14 12:34 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 7:10 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-03-14 7:23 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 7:28 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 9:18 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-03-14 12:45 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130313013101.GF14801@order.stressinduktion.org \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).