From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ipv6: use stronger hash for reassembly queue hash table Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:45:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20130314124507.GB27559@order.stressinduktion.org> References: <1362754386.15793.226.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130308150831.GD28531@order.stressinduktion.org> <1362756219.15793.240.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130313012715.GE14801@order.stressinduktion.org> <1363152568.13690.35.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130314013702.GA4129@order.stressinduktion.org> <1363245040.14913.11.camel@localhost> <20130314072341.GC4129@order.stressinduktion.org> <20130314072839.GD4129@order.stressinduktion.org> <1363252690.14913.42.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Received: from order.stressinduktion.org ([87.106.68.36]:35012 "EHLO order.stressinduktion.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757656Ab3CNMpI (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:45:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1363252690.14913.42.camel@localhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:18:10AM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > I will start working on this as soon as Netfilter Workshop is over and I > have recovered from organizing this event. DaveM told me I needed to > finish my frag patches first, before I could implement all the other > cool ideas we have come up with during the workshop ;-) Yeah, I have had a look at your patches, looks promising. Definitely worth that you get some pressure to finish them. :) > But I don't know if my frag changes can make v3.9, maybe v3.10 is more > realistic? In which case we should use your patch to close this problem > on v3.9 IMHO. Sounds good.