From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] net: filter: BPF updates Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:51:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20130319.105111.544492969414189008.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20130319.103803.368214683799955215.davem@davemloft.net> <5148793F.3000000@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, jasowang@redhat.com To: dborkman@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:43481 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932121Ab3CSOvN (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:51:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5148793F.3000000@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:42:07 +0100 > On 03/19/2013 03:38 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Daniel Borkmann >> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:33:59 +0100 >> >>> This set adds i) an ancillary operation to the BPF engine and ii) a >>> BPF JIT image disassembler in order to verify or debug the BPF JIT >>> compilers under arch/*/net/. >>> >>> v1 -> v2: >>> - No need to reorder choke_skb_cb structure >> >> So we want the first patch in 'net' right? > > Eric and Jason mentioned that they need to do a bug fix, where they > could simplify code for the fix by having the 1st patch of this set > in the net tree as well. > > However, all other patches of this set except the last one also depend > on the first one, so it would be net and net-next then. Eric, please > correct me if I'm wrong? That's fine, I can handle such dependencies without any problems.