From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] gro: relax ID check in inet_gro_receive() Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:20:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20130321.162017.605403865098695084.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20130321.145627.565133121162775865.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: dkravkov@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dmitry@broadcom.com, eilong@broadcom.com, pshelar@nicira.com, hkchu@google.com To: maze@google.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:46669 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751967Ab3CUUUV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:20:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Maciej =AFenczykowski Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:14:44 -0700 > Reverting/deleting this code is going way too far. > Mark it experimental, but don't delete it. I disagree, people who want to play can apply the code to their tree. It's as simple as that. We have very reasonable requirements for segmentation offloads, if they are not met, the feature isn't working correctly and therefore isn't ready for upstream. Now if someone can provide a fix soon, that's fine too.