From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add support for handling queueing in hardware
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:17:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20130322.111759.2108472348146991505.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <A5ACC15C-361D-48E6-BFFF-9AA3966C2A68@freescale.com>
	<20130322.103302.1277256650283142022.davem@davemloft.net>
	<FE78128C-01DB-4831-ACBE-BA3E3A428BFC@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: afleming@freescale.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: benmcollins13@gmail.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <FE78128C-01DB-4831-ACBE-BA3E3A428BFC@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Ben Collins <benmcollins13@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:43:44 -0400

> "For us" is a loose term, when it's more that we are attempting to
> upstream code so our system is supported by a mainline kernel
> instead of having one-off kernels.

If this other person doesn't want their code upstreams, it is absolutely
inappropriate for you to try and force the matter and "do it for them."