From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Subject: [net-next PATCH 1/3] net: frag, avoid several CPUs grabbing same frag queue during LRU evictor loop
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:55:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130327155457.15203.69656.stgit@dragon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130327155238.15203.6688.stgit@dragon>
The LRU list is protected by its own lock, since commit 3ef0eb0db4
(net: frag, move LRU list maintenance outside of rwlock), and
no-longer by a read_lock.
This makes it possible, to remove the inet_frag_queue, which is about
to be "evicted", from the LRU list head. This avoids the problem, of
several CPUs grabbing the same frag queue.
Note, cannot remove the inet_frag_lru_del() call in fq_unlink()
called by inet_frag_kill(), because inet_frag_kill() is also used in
other situations. Thus, we use list_del_init() to allow this
double list_del to work.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
---
net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
index 2bff045..8ba548a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
@@ -204,6 +204,9 @@ int inet_frag_evictor(struct netns_frags *nf, struct inet_frags *f, bool force)
q = list_first_entry(&nf->lru_list,
struct inet_frag_queue, lru_list);
atomic_inc(&q->refcnt);
+ /* Remove q from list to avoid several CPUs grabbing it */
+ list_del_init(&q->lru_list);
+
spin_unlock(&nf->lru_lock);
spin_lock(&q->lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-27 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-27 15:54 [net-next PATCH 0/3] net: frag performance followup Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-03-27 15:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2013-03-27 16:14 ` [net-next PATCH 1/3] net: frag, avoid several CPUs grabbing same frag queue during LRU evictor loop Eric Dumazet
2013-03-27 17:10 ` David Miller
2013-03-27 15:55 ` [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: use the frag lru_lock to protect netns_frags.nqueues update Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-03-27 16:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-27 17:10 ` David Miller
2013-03-27 15:56 ` [net-next PATCH 3/3] net: frag queue per hash bucket locking Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-03-27 17:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-28 18:57 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-28 19:03 ` David Miller
2013-03-28 19:10 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-28 19:19 ` David Miller
2013-03-28 20:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-28 23:30 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-28 23:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-29 0:33 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-29 19:01 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-03-29 19:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-29 19:22 ` David Miller
2013-04-02 15:23 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-03 22:11 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-04 7:52 ` [net-next PATCH V2] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-04 9:03 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-04-04 9:27 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-04 9:38 ` [net-next PATCH V3] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-04 9:58 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-04-04 16:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-04 21:38 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130327155457.15203.69656.stgit@dragon \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).