netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: vvs@parallels.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@parallels.com,
	jhs@mojatatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cbq: incorrect processing of high limits
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:30:54 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402.143054.1460998027326004295.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364833476.5113.157.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:24:36 -0700

> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 17:01 +0400, Vasily Averin wrote:
>> currently cbq works incorrectly for limits > 10% real link bandwidth,
>> and practically does not work for limits > 50% real link bandwidth.
>> Below are results of experiments taken on 1 Gbit link
>> 
>>  In shaper | Actual Result
>> -----------+---------------
>>   100M     | 108 Mbps
>>   200M     | 244 Mbps
>>   300M     | 412 Mbps
>>   500M     | 893 Mbps
>> 
>> This happen because of q->now changes incorrectly in cbq_dequeue():
>> when it is called before real end of packet transmitting,
>> L2T is greater than real time delay, q_now gets an extra boost
>> but never compensate it.
>> 
>> To fix this problem we prevent change of q->now until its synchronization
>> with real time.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@openvz.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
 ...
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Applied, thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2013-04-02 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-01 13:01 [PATCH 1/1] cbq: incorrect processing of high limits Vasily Averin
2013-04-01 16:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-02 18:30   ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130402.143054.1460998027326004295.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=kuznet@parallels.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vvs@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).