From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [net-next PATCH 0/3] net: frag code fixes and RFC for LRU removal
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:37:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130418213637.14296.43143.stgit@dragon> (raw)
This patchset is mostly fixes I discovered while working on removing
the LRU system, which is almost done (included as a RFC patch-03), but
I wanted to push these patches for review first.
Patch-01: net: fix race bug in fragmentation create code
- Is a race fix that is only visible with patch-02 in place.
Patch-02: net: fix enforcing of fragment queue hash list depth
- Fixes unfortunately effect of Hannes hash depth limit, but is also
part of the direct hash cleaning strategy, which is needed before we
can remove the LRU list cleaning system
Patch-03: net: remove fragmentation LRU list system
- This patch is BROKEN do not apply, RFC only.
I have a bug in inet_frag_cleanup_netns().
Patchset based on top of net-next commit 953c96e0d8 (v3.9-rc5-1145-g953c96e).
Same test setup:
Two 10G interfaces, on seperate NUMA nodes, are under-test, and uses
Ethernet flow-control. A third interface is used for generating the
DoS attack (with trafgen).
Test types summary (netperf UDP_STREAM):
Test-20G64K == 2x10G with 65K fragments
Test-20G3F == 2x10G with 3x fragments (3*1472 bytes)
Test-20G64K+DoS == Same as 20G64K with frag DoS
Test-20G3F+DoS == Same as 20G3F with frag DoS
Test-20G64K+MQ == Same as 20G64K with Multi-Queue frag DoS
Test-20G3F+MQ == Same as 20G3F with Multi-Queue frag DoS
Performance table summary (in Mbit/s):
Test-type: 20G64K 20G3F 20G64K+DoS 20G3F+DoS 20G64K+MQ 20G3F+MQ
---------- ------- ------- ---------- --------- -------- -------
net-next: 17417.4 11376.5 3853.43 6170.56 174.8 402.9
patch-01: 17337.1 11541.4 3803.89 6041.52 171.6 416.1
patch-02: 16674.7 11113.8 3806.43 7892.50 405.5 759.3
(below, work-in-progress removing LRU system, hash clean only)
patch-03: 19108.1 13369.2 9923.58 10235.10 1547.2 1795.5
---
Jesper Dangaard Brouer (3):
net: remove fragmentation LRU list system
net: fix enforcing of fragment queue hash list depth
net: fix race bug in fragmentation create code
include/net/inet_frag.h | 45 ++++-----
include/net/ipv6.h | 2
net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++------------
net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c | 32 ++-----
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c | 10 --
net/ipv6/reassembly.c | 23 +++--
6 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-18 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-18 21:37 Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2013-04-18 21:37 ` [net-next PATCH 1/3] net: fix race bug in fragmentation create code Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-19 1:00 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-04-19 8:09 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-18 21:38 ` [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: fix enforcing of fragment queue hash list depth Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-19 0:52 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-04-19 10:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-19 10:41 ` David Laight
2013-04-19 11:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-19 12:19 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-19 12:45 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-04-19 14:29 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-19 15:06 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-04-19 19:44 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-04-22 9:10 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-22 14:54 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-04-22 16:30 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-22 17:49 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-23 0:20 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-04-23 14:19 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-23 20:54 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-04-19 14:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-19 14:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-19 14:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-19 14:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-24 13:35 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-24 15:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-18 21:39 ` [RFC net-next PATCH 3/3] net: remove fragmentation LRU list system Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130418213637.14296.43143.stgit@dragon \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).