From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000: limit udelay for phy changes to 10000us Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:27:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20130421142713.GU16732@two.firstfloor.org> References: <1366515095-17734-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1366515285.2209.17.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen To: Jeff Kirsher Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([193.170.194.197]:49882 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753693Ab3DUOfA (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Apr 2013 10:35:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1366515285.2209.17.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 08:34:45PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 20:31 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > From: Andi Kleen > > > > If you really want 100000us you should really use mdelay or so. > > > > Found by the LTO kernel build > > > > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Thanks Andi, I will add the patch to my igb queue. Do you want me to > fix up the patch title as well? :-) (s/e1000/igb/) Sure please fix. BTW I'm not sure my fix/value is right. If you really need 100000us you need some other mechanism to wait. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.