From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] ipv6: separate out procfs code from mcast.c
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:11:35 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20130423.031135.166163672665280174.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1366700820-26052-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
To: amwang@redhat.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:45144 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755332Ab3DWHLi (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:11:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1366700820-26052-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:07:00 +0800

> From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
> 
> They well deserve a separated unit.
> 
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> 
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>

Cong, I'm not even reading these patches.

You're on this idea that you can just keep the sysfs and procfs bits
of ipv6 modular, and make the rest of ipv6 statically linked into the
kernel.

I'm not going to facilitate nor take this seriously.

Sorry.