From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: nhorman@tuxdriver.com
Cc: bart.vanassche@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] spinlock: split out debugging check from spin_lock_mutex
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:33:15 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130423.133315.1278191592594257624.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130423134443.GB5564@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:44:43 -0400
> Dave, how do you feel about it? I'm comfortable with the wait queue change I've
> proposed, but I've not received any reports of actual netpoll deadlocks (i.e.
> the mutex solution is reporting a warning, but no actual problems). So I think
> its safe to wait a bit longer, unless you just want this squared away now.
If it's just a warning and people aren't actually hitting the
potential deadlock, it can wait.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-23 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-11 13:42 Netpoll triggers soft lockup Bart Van Assche
2013-04-11 14:08 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-11 15:18 ` [PATCH RFC] spinlock: split out debugging check from spin_lock_mutex Neil Horman
2013-04-11 15:54 ` Christoph Paasch
2013-04-11 17:04 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-11 17:51 ` Christoph Paasch
2013-04-11 15:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-11 16:56 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-11 17:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-04-11 17:52 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-11 19:14 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-12 6:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-04-12 11:32 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-12 14:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-04-12 18:45 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-13 7:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-04-13 12:03 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-15 14:16 ` Neil Horman
[not found] ` <CAO+b5-oBfH3M0dnrQSs-p1BF_5hKy2tsU-dD=EP9+S=iqPs5ew@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-16 17:24 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-18 19:29 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-22 20:12 ` Neil Horman
[not found] ` <CAO+b5-r5jVJNZWuREUH5MQ3baeSPR8fVV1p9pMnukmiZd9nRhg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-23 13:23 ` Neil Horman
[not found] ` <CAO+b5-rQPyO9QE9v+oQTeo+G-ftcsehSB5=63AZ13QW4EJ1X0Q@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-23 13:44 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-23 17:33 ` David Miller [this message]
2013-04-23 17:50 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-27 18:53 ` bvba Bart Van Assche
2013-04-29 18:13 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-29 19:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-04-30 15:35 ` [PATCH RFC] netpoll: convert mutex into a semaphore Neil Horman
2013-05-01 19:00 ` David Miller
2013-05-01 19:34 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-19 8:38 ` [PATCH RFC] spinlock: split out debugging check from spin_lock_mutex Ingo Molnar
2013-04-19 12:52 ` Neil Horman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-28 2:34 Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130423.133315.1278191592594257624.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).