From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v7 4/6] vxlan: add ipv6 support Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:05:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20130430.150547.2297961494334074636.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1367311395-15891-5-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <87r4hscr7s.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <1367313956.3216.18.camel@cr0> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: bjorn@mork.no, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dlstevens@us.ibm.com, stephen@networkplumber.org To: amwang@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:52190 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932467Ab3D3TFt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:05:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1367313956.3216.18.camel@cr0> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Cong Wang Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:25:56 +0800 > On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 11:17 +0200, Bj=F8rn Mork wrote: >> Please take your time to clean up your todo-list and *test* the resu= lt >> with different runtime and buildtime settings. There is no need to r= ush >> this, and people may get tired of looking at the same shortcomings o= ver >> and over again. >>=20 >=20 > So, why do you expect it is perfect? Your patch has had large, major, shortcomings every single iteration. It isn't ready yet, and now that the net-next tree is closed, you have time to work on the patch series slowly, and carefully, instead of trying to rush things and making several mistakes.