From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v3b 1/3] tipc: cosmetic: clean up comments and break a long line Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 13:16:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20130501.131602.899596493606702378.davem@davemloft.net> References: <51814058.3080805@cogentembedded.com> <1367426477-10441-1-git-send-email-gerlando.falauto@keymile.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, jon.maloy@ericsson.com, erik.hugne@ericsson.com, ying.xue@windriver.com, holger.brunck@keymile.com To: gerlando.falauto@keymile.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:40066 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750887Ab3EARQG (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2013 13:16:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1367426477-10441-1-git-send-email-gerlando.falauto@keymile.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Gerlando Falauto Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 18:41:17 +0200 > Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto > --- > Changes from v3: > * Added "and break a long line" to the commit message > Changes from v2: > * Split cosmetic (this patch) from functional changes (next patch) Never resubmit patches by themselves, always resubmit the entire series. Because when one patch has problems, I toss the entire series from patchwork, and by resubmitting the entire series again you are also giving me important information, you're telling me that the subsequent patches in the series still apply cleanly even though the first one has changed. I've tossed this patch too, resubmit this properly, thanks.