From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3b 1/3] tipc: cosmetic: clean up comments and break a
 long line
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 13:43:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20130501.134356.491039302692790983.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1367426477-10441-1-git-send-email-gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
	<20130501.131602.899596493606702378.davem@davemloft.net>
	<5181524D.6000207@keymile.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com,
	jon.maloy@ericsson.com, erik.hugne@ericsson.com,
	ying.xue@windriver.com, Holger.Brunck@keymile.com
To: gerlando.falauto@keymile.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:40343 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753025Ab3EARn7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 1 May 2013 13:43:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5181524D.6000207@keymile.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 19:35:09 +0200

> That I don't understand. I thought it would be the other way around,
> that's why I resubmitted only the one which changed.

Any patch you submit I assume you test applied yourself successfully,
therefore by submitting it you are saying that you validated them
as a series explicitly or know that the other patches have no conflicts.

Also, please never submit new versions of patches in replies to older
patch discussions.

Chain replies in order to construct a series are OK, especially when
you provide a proper "[PATCH 0/N] ..." initial posting explaining
the series.