From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lance Lassetter Subject: Re: r8169 with 3.9.0-rc9 Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 21:23:31 -0500 Message-ID: <20130502022330.GB30099@gmail.com> References: <20130426132254.GA22821@gmail.com> <20130426205018.GA18092@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20130427041230.GA18709@gmail.com> <20130428011232.GA4236@gmail.com> <20130501100733.GA16115@gmail.com> <20130501121502.GA5456@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20130501212803.GA3342@gmail.com> <20130501223155.GA15261@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Francois Romieu Return-path: Received: from mail-ye0-f171.google.com ([209.85.213.171]:37088 "EHLO mail-ye0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756807Ab3EBCXf (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2013 22:23:35 -0400 Received: by mail-ye0-f171.google.com with SMTP id l12so26610yen.16 for ; Wed, 01 May 2013 19:23:34 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130501223155.GA15261@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:31:55AM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > Lance Lassetter : > [...] > > Yes, it was an up to date Fedora 17. I know this is probably redundant but > > I also tried Realtek firmware from a Debian Sid box onto the Fedora 18 > > using testing repos with vanilla stable kernel to the same result. > > > > Should I file a Red Hat bug ? > > Not yet. > > > Manually change IRQs, what do you think? > > I need the version of the last known working Fedora 17 kernel or > your Fedora 18 install date if you can't retrieve it. > > A complete dmesg and the content of /proc/interrupts will be welcome. > > Thanks. > > -- > Ueimor The initial FC18 Alpha kernel was 3.6 RC2 Fedora Core kernel. I've just started using Fedora vanilla repos for kernel just recently; although they are not pure vanilla and do contain a minimal patchset from Fedora. I've never compiled my own kernel on the machine with the r8169 issue. Thanks, Lance