From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/4] Revert "inet: limit length of fragment queue hash table bucket lists"
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 11:15:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130503111507.1f5ec1af@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367507801.29805.12.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On Thu, 02 May 2013 08:16:41 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 09:59 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:00:30 -0700 Eric Dumazet
> > <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 17:48 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > > This reverts commit 5a3da1fe9561828d0ca7eca664b16ec2b9bf0055.
> > > >
> > > > The problem with commit 5a3da1fe (inet: limit length of fragment
> > > > queue hash table bucket lists) is that, once we hit the hash
> > > > depth limit (of 128), the we *keep* the existing frag queues,
> > > > not allowing new frag queues to be created. Thus, an attacker
> > > > can effectivly block handling of fragments for 30 sec (as each
> > > > frag queue have a timeout of 30 sec)
> > > >
> > >
> > > I do not think its good to revert this patch. It was a step in
> > > right direction.
> >
> > We need a revert, because we are too close to the merge window, and
> > cannot complete the needed "steps" to make this patch safe, sorry.
>
[...]
>
> For people willing to allow more memory to be used, the only way is to
> resize hash table, or using a bigger INETFRAGS_HASHSZ
>
> I do not think there is a hurry, current defrag code is already better
> than what we had years ago.
Eric I think we agree that:
1) we need resizing of hash table based on mem limit
2) mem limit per netns "blocks" the hash resize patch
Without these two patches/changes, the static 128 depth limit
introduces an undocumented limit on the max mem limit
setting (/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ipfrag_high_thresh).
I think we only disagree on the order of the patches.
But lets keep this, because after we have increased hash
size (INETFRAGS_HASHSZ) to 1024, we have pushed the "undocumented
limit" so-far that is very unlikely to be hit. We would have to
start >36 netns instances, all being overloaded with small
incomplete fragments at the same time (30 sec time window).
--Jesper
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-03 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 15:47 [net-next PATCH 0/4] net: frag patchset for fixing LRU scalability issue Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-24 15:48 ` [net-next PATCH 1/4] Revert "inet: limit length of fragment queue hash table bucket lists" Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-25 0:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-25 13:10 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-25 13:58 ` David Laight
2013-05-02 7:59 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-05-02 15:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-03 9:15 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2013-04-24 15:48 ` [net-next PATCH 2/4] net: increase frag hash size Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-24 22:09 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-04-25 10:13 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-25 12:13 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-04-25 19:11 ` David Miller
2013-04-24 23:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-25 3:26 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-04-25 19:52 ` [net-next PATCH V2] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-29 17:44 ` David Miller
2013-04-24 15:48 ` [net-next PATCH 3/4] net: avoid false perf interpretations in frag code Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-24 23:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-24 23:54 ` David Miller
2013-04-25 10:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-25 19:13 ` David Miller
2013-04-24 15:48 ` [net-next PATCH 4/4] net: frag LRU list per CPU Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-25 0:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-25 2:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-25 14:06 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-25 14:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-25 13:59 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-25 14:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-25 14:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-25 19:15 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-25 19:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-24 16:21 ` [net-next PATCH 0/4] net: frag patchset for fixing LRU scalabilityissue David Laight
2013-04-25 11:39 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-04-25 12:57 ` David Laight
2013-04-24 17:27 ` [net-next PATCH 0/4] net: frag patchset for fixing LRU scalability issue Hannes Frederic Sowa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130503111507.1f5ec1af@redhat.com \
--to=jbrouer@redhat.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).