From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: PATCH iproute2] catch iptables interface changes Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 08:09:58 -0700 Message-ID: <20130506080958.79562cfe@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <517D35D6.8090606@mojatatu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Jan Engelhardt , Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Jamal Hadi Salim Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:59001 "EHLO mail-pd0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753652Ab3EFPKC (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2013 11:10:02 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p11so2059012pdj.12 for ; Mon, 06 May 2013 08:10:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <517D35D6.8090606@mojatatu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 10:44:38 -0400 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > > Thanks to Jan for this suggestion. > Hopefully this would ease some of the pain. > > cheers, > jamal Any feedback from the netfilter team? Is this right? I would prefer to change wording of the error to something more professional. It may trigger 15 years from now and everybody around forgot what that meant.