From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: mv643xx_eth: proper initialization for
 Kirkwood SoCs
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 13:03:35 -0400
Message-ID: <20130524170335.GY31290@titan.lakedaemon.net>
References: <1369253042-15082-2-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
 <20130522201607.GA18823@obsidianresearch.com>
 <20130523160111.GP31290@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <20130523171112.GB31281@obsidianresearch.com>
 <20130523172339.GQ31290@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <20130523175357.GB2821@obsidianresearch.com>
 <20130523184028.GU31290@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <20130523190140.GA4010@obsidianresearch.com>
 <20130524164636.GV31290@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <20130524165315.GX26249@lunn.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
 Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>,
 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
 Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Return-path: <linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130524165315.GX26249@lunn.ch>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>,
 <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>,
 <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:53:15PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Why are you not keen on this? It seems like normal device driver
> > > practice, that is what the data field of of_device_id is typically
> > > used for..
> > 
> > I'm not keen on it because we don't have a document saying "All kirkwood
> > SoCs need PSC1 set to X after reset."  We know it, but have we tested
> > the 6282?
> 
> 6282 looses its MAC address, that much i know. I've no idea about
> PSC1, but if its MAC address behaviour is the same as 6281, is expect
> PSC1 is the same.

Do you have a board set up for testing you could try Sebastian's
forthcoming series on (with "marvell,kirkwood-eth")?

thx,

Jason.