Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: majnemer@google.com
To: davem@davemloft.net
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: pjt@google.com
To: maze@google.com
To: therbert@google.com
Subject: [PATCH] net: Update RPS target at poll for inet
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 17:47:30 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130529004731.0CC5280D76@donbot.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)

Hello,

The current state of affairs is that read(2)/write(2) will engage
RPS (receive packet steering) for internet protocol sockets while
poll(2) does not.

We noticed that this is suboptimal for scenarios similar to the following:
1. Perform a poll(2) on a socket.
2. Block in sock_poll_wait (or something similar).
3. Perform a read(2) on the previously mentioned socket.

This patch updates the RPS target during poll(2) which improves this scenario.

Concretely, we saw improvements on the order of ~20% for the median and
~6% for the mean on our internal packet forwarding workload. Let me know if
there is another workload I should take a look at.

Thanks,
David

-----------------------------8<---------------------------

When poll(2) gets called with an ip socket, update the flow target to be the
poller. The data will be on the appropriate CPU when the poller later calls
recvmsg(2).

Signed-off-by: David Majnemer <majnemer@google.com>
---
 include/net/inet_common.h |  2 ++
 net/ipv4/af_inet.c        | 13 ++++++++++++-
 net/ipv4/tcp.c            |  2 ++
 net/ipv4/udp.c            |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/inet_common.h b/include/net/inet_common.h
index 2340087..21ecdb3 100644
--- a/include/net/inet_common.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_common.h
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ extern int __inet_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
 				 int addr_len, int flags);
 extern int inet_dgram_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
 			      int addr_len, int flags);
+extern unsigned int inet_dgram_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
+				    poll_table *wait);
 extern int inet_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags);
 extern int inet_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
 			struct msghdr *msg, size_t size);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
index b05ae96..e864612 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -567,6 +567,17 @@ int inet_dgram_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_dgram_connect);
 
+unsigned int inet_dgram_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
+			     poll_table *wait)
+{
+	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+
+	sock_rps_record_flow(sk);
+
+	return datagram_poll(file, sock, wait);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_dgram_poll);
+
 static long inet_wait_for_connect(struct sock *sk, long timeo, int writebias)
 {
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
@@ -1001,7 +1012,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops inet_sockraw_ops = {
 	.socketpair	   = sock_no_socketpair,
 	.accept		   = sock_no_accept,
 	.getname	   = inet_getname,
-	.poll		   = datagram_poll,
+	.poll		   = inet_dgram_poll,
 	.ioctl		   = inet_ioctl,
 	.listen		   = sock_no_listen,
 	.shutdown	   = inet_shutdown,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index ba4186e..6aa930a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -436,6 +436,8 @@ unsigned int tcp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait)
 	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
 	const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
 
+	sock_rps_record_flow(sk);
+
 	sock_poll_wait(file, sk_sleep(sk), wait);
 	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)
 		return inet_csk_listen_poll(sk);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index aa5eff4..c7338ec 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1967,6 +1967,8 @@ unsigned int udp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait)
 	unsigned int mask = datagram_poll(file, sock, wait);
 	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
 
+	sock_rps_record_flow(sk);
+
 	/* Check for false positives due to checksum errors */
 	if ((mask & POLLRDNORM) && !(file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) &&
 	    !(sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) && !first_packet_length(sk))
-- 
1.8.2.1

             reply	other threads:[~2013-05-29  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-29  0:47 majnemer [this message]
2013-05-29  1:07 ` [PATCH] net: Update RPS target at poll for inet Eric Dumazet
2013-05-29 22:23   ` David Majnemer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130529004731.0CC5280D76@donbot.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=majnemer@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox