From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] vxlan: allow specifying multiple default destinations Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 10:07:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20130530100747.5b9c7893@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <1369821617-29098-1-git-send-email-mike.rapoport@ravellosystems.com> <1369821617-29098-4-git-send-email-mike.rapoport@ravellosystems.com> <20130529155625.2ee5f6bb@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20130530114424.GC10532@casper.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mike Rapoport , Cong Wang , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Graf Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:59310 "EHLO mail-pd0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758408Ab3E3RHv (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2013 13:07:51 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x10so704947pdj.29 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:07:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130530114424.GC10532@casper.infradead.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 30 May 2013 12:44:24 +0100 Thomas Graf wrote: > > Say, misc/vxlan that will handle remote destinations management? Or > > should it take care of some vxlan parameters currently implemented in > > ip/iplink_vxlan and bridge/fdb? > > What do we gain from a separate tool? At some point the syntax becomes unwieldy, could even just be a shell script.