From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] vxlan: allow specifying multiple default destinations Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 16:57:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20130530155719.GD10532@casper.infradead.org> References: <1369821617-29098-1-git-send-email-mike.rapoport@ravellosystems.com> <1369821617-29098-4-git-send-email-mike.rapoport@ravellosystems.com> <20130529155625.2ee5f6bb@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20130530114424.GC10532@casper.infradead.org> <20130530124652.GA29547@zed.ravello.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Cong Wang , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Rapoport Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:44640 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933729Ab3E3P5U (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2013 11:57:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130530124652.GA29547@zed.ravello.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/30/13 at 03:46pm, Mike Rapoport wrote: > I'm feeling Ok about "ip link set [..] dstadd/dstdel". What does bother > me is that you can't have different parameters for "ip link add" and "ip > link set" for vxlan (and other iplink) utility. So, one can use > ip link add [..] dstdel > which does not make sense... You can easily pass an additional argument into iplink_modify() and exclude certain options in the "add" use case.