Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v3] net: clean up skb headers code
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 09:25:17 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130531002517.GC26684@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369879575-18701-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com>

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:06:15AM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
> 
> commit 1a37e412a0225fcba5587 (net: Use 16bits for *_headers
> fields of struct skbuff) converts skb->*_header to u16,
> some #if NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET are now useless,
> and to be safe, we could just use "X = ~(typeof(X))0;"
> as suggested by David and Ben.
> 
> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>

FWIW, I would prefer to see a patch that just removes the instances
of #ifdef NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET below, and then a separate
patch to clean-up the use of ~0U once some consensus is reached on
the best approach.

The reason is that I suspect that the #ifdef NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET
is a bug fix for cases where it is not defined. Whereas the ~0 discussion
is more cosmetic.

> 
> ---
> v2: use typeof
> v3: use ~(typeof(X))0
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 5f93119..f3c18a0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@ static inline void skb_set_inner_mac_header(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  }
>  static inline bool skb_transport_header_was_set(const struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> -	return skb->transport_header != ~0U;
> +	return skb->transport_header != ~(typeof(skb->transport_header))0;
>  }
>  
>  static inline unsigned char *skb_transport_header(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> @@ -1636,7 +1636,7 @@ static inline unsigned char *skb_mac_header(const struct sk_buff *skb)
>  
>  static inline int skb_mac_header_was_set(const struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> -	return skb->mac_header != ~0U;
> +	return skb->mac_header != ~(typeof(skb->mac_header))0;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void skb_reset_mac_header(struct sk_buff *skb)
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index f45de07..e121c4b 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -199,9 +199,7 @@ struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb_head(gfp_t gfp_mask, int node)
>  	skb->truesize = sizeof(struct sk_buff);
>  	atomic_set(&skb->users, 1);
>  
> -#ifdef NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET
> -	skb->mac_header = (__u16) ~0U;
> -#endif
> +	skb->mac_header = ~(typeof(skb->mac_header))0;
>  out:
>  	return skb;
>  }
> @@ -275,10 +273,8 @@ struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  	skb->data = data;
>  	skb_reset_tail_pointer(skb);
>  	skb->end = skb->tail + size;
> -#ifdef NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET
> -	skb->mac_header = (__u16) ~0U;
> -	skb->transport_header = (__u16) ~0U;
> -#endif
> +	skb->mac_header = ~(typeof(skb->mac_header))0;
> +	skb->transport_header = ~(typeof(skb->transport_header))0;
>  
>  	/* make sure we initialize shinfo sequentially */
>  	shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> @@ -344,10 +340,8 @@ struct sk_buff *build_skb(void *data, unsigned int frag_size)
>  	skb->data = data;
>  	skb_reset_tail_pointer(skb);
>  	skb->end = skb->tail + size;
> -#ifdef NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET
> -	skb->mac_header = (__u16) ~0U;
> -	skb->transport_header = (__u16) ~0U;
> -#endif
> +	skb->mac_header = ~(typeof(skb->mac_header))0;
> +	skb->transport_header = ~(typeof(skb->transport_header))0;
>  
>  	/* make sure we initialize shinfo sequentially */
>  	shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-31  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-30  2:06 [Patch net-next v3] net: clean up skb headers code Cong Wang
2013-05-30 11:18 ` David Laight
2013-05-30 20:16   ` David Miller
2013-05-30 21:05     ` Ben Hutchings
2013-05-31  0:18       ` Simon Horman
2013-05-31  0:25 ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130531002517.GC26684@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox