From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
Subject: Re: [net-next rfc V3 7/9] macvtap: allow TUNSETIFF to create multiqueue device
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 13:43:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130605104306.GG31830@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370414192-5830-8-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 02:36:30PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Though the queue were in fact created by open(), we still need to add this check
> to be compatible with tuntap which can let mgmt software use a single API to
> manage queues. This patch only validates the device name and moves the TUNSETIFF
> to a helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
The patch is OK, the description is confusing.
What you mean is simply:
Allow IFF_MULTI_QUEUE in TUNSETIFF for macvtap, to match
tun behaviour.
And if you put it like this, I would say make this
the last patch in the series, so userspace
can use IFF_MULTI_QUEUE to detect new versus old
behaviour.
> ---
> drivers/net/macvtap.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> index 5ccba99..14764cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> @@ -869,6 +869,7 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +
> static struct macvlan_dev *macvtap_get_vlan(struct macvtap_queue *q)
> {
> struct macvlan_dev *vlan;
Please don't.
> @@ -887,6 +888,44 @@ static void macvtap_put_vlan(struct macvlan_dev *vlan)
> dev_put(vlan->dev);
> }
>
> +static int macvtap_set_iff(struct file *file, struct ifreq __user *ifr_u)
> +{
> + struct macvtap_queue *q = file->private_data;
> + struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> + struct net_device *dev, *dev2;
> + struct ifreq ifr;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&ifr, ifr_u, sizeof(struct ifreq)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + /* To keep the same behavior of tuntap, validate ifr_name */
So I'm not sure - why is it important to validate ifr_name here?
We ignore the name for all other flags - why is IFF_MULTI_QUEUE
special?
> + if (ifr.ifr_flags & IFF_MULTI_QUEUE) {
> + dev = __dev_get_by_name(net, ifr.ifr_name);
> + if (!dev)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + dev2 = dev_get_by_macvtap_minor(iminor(inode));
> + if (!dev2)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (dev != dev2) {
> + dev_put(dev2);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + dev_put(dev2);
> + }
> +
> + if ((ifr.ifr_flags & ~(IFF_VNET_HDR | IFF_MULTI_QUEUE)) !=
> + (IFF_NO_PI | IFF_TAP))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + else
> + q->flags = ifr.ifr_flags;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * provide compatibility with generic tun/tap interface
> */
> @@ -905,17 +944,7 @@ static long macvtap_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>
> switch (cmd) {
> case TUNSETIFF:
> - /* ignore the name, just look at flags */
This is actually a useful comment that you've removed.
> - if (get_user(u, &ifr->ifr_flags))
> - return -EFAULT;
> -
> - ret = 0;
> - if ((u & ~IFF_VNET_HDR) != (IFF_NO_PI | IFF_TAP))
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - else
> - q->flags = u;
> -
> - return ret;
> + return macvtap_set_iff(file, ifr);
>
> case TUNGETIFF:
> vlan = macvtap_get_vlan(q);
> --
> 1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-05 6:36 [net-next rfc V3 0/9] Multiqueue API for macvtap Jason Wang
2013-06-05 6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 1/9] macvtap: fix a possible race between queue selection and changing queues Jason Wang
2013-06-05 10:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-05 6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 2/9] macvtap: do not add self to waitqueue if doing a nonblock read Jason Wang
2013-06-05 11:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-05 6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 3/9] macvlan: switch to use IS_ENABLED() Jason Wang
2013-06-05 6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 4/9] macvtap: introduce macvtap_get_vlan() Jason Wang
2013-06-05 6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 5/9] macvlan: change the max number of queues to 16 Jason Wang
2013-06-05 6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 6/9] macvtap: eliminate linear search Jason Wang
2013-06-05 6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 7/9] macvtap: allow TUNSETIFF to create multiqueue device Jason Wang
2013-06-05 10:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-06-06 3:13 ` Jason Wang
2013-06-06 6:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-06 7:12 ` Jason Wang
2013-06-06 7:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-06 7:31 ` Jason Wang
2013-06-05 6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 8/9] macvtap: add TUNSETQUEUE ioctl Jason Wang
2013-06-05 10:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-06 3:16 ` Jason Wang
2013-06-06 7:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-06 7:30 ` Jason Wang
2013-06-05 6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 9/9] macvtap: enable multiqueue flag Jason Wang
2013-06-05 10:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 0/9] Multiqueue API for macvtap Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-06 3:07 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130605104306.GG31830@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).