From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] openvswitch: Use zerocopy if applicable when performing the upcall Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:43:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20130610.134331.1301662479712409021.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20130607122139.GA21856@casper.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tgraf@suug.ch, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org To: jesse@nicira.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:59555 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752657Ab3FJUnc (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:43:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jesse Gross Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:34:23 -0700 > Well, this is the slow path. I don't want to force userspace to deal > with this because it's an internal kernel optimization that is > platform-specific and requires carrying additional metadata around. I think the grounds for this rejection is over the top and unreasonable.