Re: [patch net-next 1/3] team: remove synchronize_rcu() called during queue override change

[Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:42:23PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> This patch removes synchronize_rcu() from function
> __team_queue_override_port_del(). That can be done because it is ok to
> do list_del_rcu() and list_add_tail_rcu() on the same list_head member
> without calling synchronize_rcu() in between. A bit of refactoring
> needed to be done because INIT_LIST_HEAD needed to be removed (to not
> kill the forward pointer) as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
> ---
>  drivers/net/team/team.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
[...]

> @@ -1278,17 +1310,16 @@ static int team_queue_id_option_set(struct team *team,
>  				    struct team_gsetter_ctx *ctx)
>  {
>  	struct team_port *port = ctx->info->port;
> +	u16 new_queue_id = ctx->data.u32_val;
>  
> -	if (port->queue_id == ctx->data.u32_val)
> +	if (port->queue_id == new_queue_id)

Since you're passing new_queue_id to port->queue_id and
in the other parts you test against !port->queue_id to see
if it's enable or not, that means queue 0 can't be used.

Maybe I am missing something, but wouldn't be better to
initialize with -1 and allow 0 to be used as well?

fbl

>  		return 0;
> -	if (ctx->data.u32_val >= team->dev->real_num_tx_queues)
> +	if (new_queue_id >= team->dev->real_num_tx_queues)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	port->queue_id = ctx->data.u32_val;
> -	team_queue_override_port_refresh(team, port);
> +	team_queue_override_port_change_queue_id(team, port, new_queue_id);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>