[PATCH net-next v2 0/4] openvswitch tunneling preparation

[PATCH net-next v2 0/4] openvswitch tunneling preparation

[Pravin B Shelar]

Following patches are required but not directly related to ovs tunneling.
So I am sending them as separate series. These cleanups are already
there in out of tree ovs module.

Since ovs tunneling series depends on this, I am sending all patches
again.

Pravin B Shelar (4):
  openvswitch: Unify vport error stats handling.
  openvswitch: Simplify interface ovs_flow_metadata_from_nlattrs()
  openvswitch: Fix struct comment.
  openvswitch: make skb->csum consistent with rest of networking stack.

 include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h     |    1 -
 net/openvswitch/actions.c            |    4 ++++
 net/openvswitch/datapath.c           |    5 +----
 net/openvswitch/flow.c               |   25 +++++++++++++------------
 net/openvswitch/flow.h               |    4 ++--
 net/openvswitch/vport-internal_dev.c |    1 +
 net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c       |    3 ++-
 net/openvswitch/vport.c              |    9 +++++++--
 net/openvswitch/vport.h              |   10 +++++++++-
 9 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] openvswitch tunneling preparation

[David Miller]

From: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:11:19 -0700

> Following patches are required but not directly related to ovs tunneling.
> So I am sending them as separate series. These cleanups are already
> there in out of tree ovs module.
> 
> Since ovs tunneling series depends on this, I am sending all patches
> again.

Openvswitch folks please send me a pull request.

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] openvswitch tunneling preparation

[Jesse Gross]

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:05 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:11:19 -0700
>
>> Following patches are required but not directly related to ovs tunneling.
>> So I am sending them as separate series. These cleanups are already
>> there in out of tree ovs module.
>>
>> Since ovs tunneling series depends on this, I am sending all patches
>> again.
>
> Openvswitch folks please send me a pull request.

For the non-OVS portions of the tunneling series (not this one, which
I already applied, but the next) do you want to take them directly or
should I just throw them all into my tree?

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] openvswitch tunneling preparation

[David Miller]

From: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:28:41 -0700

> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:05 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com>
>> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:11:19 -0700
>>
>>> Following patches are required but not directly related to ovs tunneling.
>>> So I am sending them as separate series. These cleanups are already
>>> there in out of tree ovs module.
>>>
>>> Since ovs tunneling series depends on this, I am sending all patches
>>> again.
>>
>> Openvswitch folks please send me a pull request.
> 
> For the non-OVS portions of the tunneling series (not this one, which
> I already applied, but the next) do you want to take them directly or
> should I just throw them all into my tree?

I was hoping you would send me a pull request for the initial 4 patch
series et al.  Then get your ACK's for the openvswitch parts of the big
tunneling patch set so that I could just apply the entire thing myself.

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] openvswitch tunneling preparation

[Jesse Gross]

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:04 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:28:41 -0700
>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:05 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>> From: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:11:19 -0700
>>>
>>>> Following patches are required but not directly related to ovs tunneling.
>>>> So I am sending them as separate series. These cleanups are already
>>>> there in out of tree ovs module.
>>>>
>>>> Since ovs tunneling series depends on this, I am sending all patches
>>>> again.
>>>
>>> Openvswitch folks please send me a pull request.
>>
>> For the non-OVS portions of the tunneling series (not this one, which
>> I already applied, but the next) do you want to take them directly or
>> should I just throw them all into my tree?
>
> I was hoping you would send me a pull request for the initial 4 patch
> series et al.  Then get your ACK's for the openvswitch parts of the big
> tunneling patch set so that I could just apply the entire thing myself.

That works for me, I'll send the pull request now.