netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC ] netlink: limit large vmalloc() based skbs to NETLINK_NETFILTER
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 23:50:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130702215015.GA1979@breakpoint.cc> (raw)

Since commit c05cdb1b ("netlink: allow large data transfers from
user-space") the large skbs are allocated via vmalloc(). Trinity
triggered this in response:

| BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc900001bf001
| IP: [<ffffffff8135270a>] skb_clone+0x1a/0xa0
| Call Trace:
|  [<ffffffff813cb107>] nl_fib_input+0x37/0x230
|  [<ffffffff8142c9b2>] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x40
|  [<ffffffff81380b1a>] netlink_unicast+0x13a/0x1f0
|  [<ffffffff81380ef7>] netlink_sendmsg+0x327/0x420

The problem is that the vmalloc() based skb ends exactly at size (where
->end is pointing) and skb_shinfo() starts past ->end where we have our
guard page and hence we BUG().
The question is should we fix this or forbid the skb_clone(). Fixing this
behaviour is tricky because even after we add space for struct
skb_shared_info we release the memory from the destructor so once the
first skbs is gone, the memory in the clone is invalid.
The other case where skb_clone() is used is when we have mutltiple
destinations.
Since I assume the initial target was to extend the size for
NETLINK_NETFILTER this patch limits to this target only and with single
destination.
Is this okay?

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
---
 net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 68c1673..9926453 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -2129,7 +2129,11 @@ static int netlink_sendmsg(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct socket *sock,
 	if (len > sk->sk_sndbuf - 32)
 		goto out;
 	err = -ENOBUFS;
-	skb = netlink_alloc_large_skb(len);
+	if (netlink_is_kernel(sk) && sk->sk_protocol == NETLINK_NETFILTER &&
+			!dst_group)
+		skb = netlink_alloc_large_skb(len);
+	else
+		skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (skb == NULL)
 		goto out;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

             reply	other threads:[~2013-07-02 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-02 21:50 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2013-07-02 22:07 ` [RFC ] netlink: limit large vmalloc() based skbs to NETLINK_NETFILTER Eric Dumazet
2013-07-03  6:59   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-07-02 23:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130702215015.GA1979@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=sebastian@breakpoint.cc \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).