From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Pierre Emeriaud <petrus.lt@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Linux 3.9 more-specific ipv6 route ignored until next-hop is in neighbor cache
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 07:00:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130703050007.GA11216@order.stressinduktion.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+PSOpyxWf2s_JscuBYfOAW9hVkSqqC1JwdRDQ4WtZrkneQf6A@mail.gmail.com>
[Cc YOSHIFUJI Hideaki because of commit
887c95cc1da53f66a5890fdeab13414613010097 ("ipv6: Complete neighbour entry
removal from dst_entry.")]
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 12:04:33AM +0200, Pierre Emeriaud wrote:
> Linux 3.9 more-specific ipv6 route ignored until next-hop is in neighbor cache.
>
> When adding a route to 2000::/3 with a next-hop that is not in the
> neighbor cache, the route is not preferred over the default.
Thanks for the report!
Well.
We ignore this route because of rt6_score_route returning -1 in this case.
This traces down to rt6_check_neigh returning false.
Before the above mentioned commit we kicked off some logic to create a
neighbour entry in ip6_route_add. Now we end up with neigh == NULL.
This is a hotfix but I need to do more research regarding
CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF and further expectations of neigh != NULL (you
can try this at your own risk ;):
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -547,6 +547,10 @@ static inline bool rt6_check_neigh(struct rt6_info *rt)
ret = true;
#endif
read_unlock(&neigh->lock);
+ } else {
+#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
+ ret = true;
+#endif
}
rcu_read_unlock_bh();
Greetings,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-03 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-02 22:04 PROBLEM: Linux 3.9 more-specific ipv6 route ignored until next-hop is in neighbor cache Pierre Emeriaud
2013-07-03 5:00 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2013-07-03 18:15 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-07-03 18:21 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-07-03 18:45 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-07-04 0:51 ` David Miller
2013-07-04 5:20 ` Pierre Emeriaud
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130703050007.GA11216@order.stressinduktion.org \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petrus.lt@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox