netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Mortons <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@tamir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: rename low latency sockets functions to busy poll
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 16:25:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130709162514.062f1361@lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130708132034.17639.4396.stgit@ladj378.jer.intel.com>

On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:20:34 +0300
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Rename POLL_LL to POLL_BUSY_LOOP.

So pardon me if I speak out of turn, but it occurs to me to
wonder...should the SO_LL socket option be renamed in a similar fashion
before this interface escapes into the wild?

Thanks,

jon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-09 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-08 13:20 [PATCH net-next] net: rename low latency sockets functions to busy poll Eliezer Tamir
2013-07-08 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-07-08 17:14   ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-07-08 19:37     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-07-08 19:46       ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-07-08 19:59         ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-08 20:05         ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-08 20:10           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-07-09  2:27       ` David Miller
2013-07-09 22:25 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2013-07-09 23:06   ` David Miller
2013-07-10  3:29     ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-07-10  4:41       ` David Miller
2013-07-10  5:21         ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-07-10  6:10           ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130709162514.062f1361@lwn.net \
    --to=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eliezer@tamir.org.il \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).