From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Wilson Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen-netback: calculate the number of slots required for large MTU vifs Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:40:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20130716174055.GA4401@u109add4315675089e695.ant.amazon.com> References: <20130709221406.GA13671@u109add4315675089e695.ant.amazon.com> <1373409659-22383-1-git-send-email-msw@amazon.com> <20130710081333.GI19798@zion.uk.xensource.com> <20130710193703.GB20453@zion.uk.xensource.com> <20130711051441.GA5189@u109add4315675089e695.ant.amazon.com> <51E51B83.7040302@oracle.com> <20130716102719.GD5674@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: annie li , , Xi Xiong , Ian Campbell , To: Wei Liu Return-path: Received: from smtp-fw-2101.amazon.com ([72.21.196.25]:12791 "EHLO smtp-fw-2101.amazon.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933059Ab3GPRlV (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:41:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130716102719.GD5674@zion.uk.xensource.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:27:19AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 06:08:03PM +0800, annie li wrote: > > > > On 2013-7-11 13:14, Matt Wilson wrote: > > >I think that this patch addresses the problem more completely. Annie? > > > > Agree, it is better to take your patch. Would you like to go forward > > with it? This issue is obvious and easy to be hit with larger MTU > > size. > > > > I'm going to be on vacation tomorrow. Matt, feel free to add my Acked-by to > your patch. Thanks, Wei. I'm on vacation now and I'll return to the office tomorrow. Please accept my apologies for the delay. I should have time to clean up a few things with this patch (no functional changes) and post a final version this week. --msw > Wei. > > > Thanks > > Annie