netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xfrm: Delete hold_timer when destroy policy
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 10:05:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130806080506.GF25511@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51FB09C0.7090807@windriver.com>

On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 09:22:08AM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2013年08月01日 20:01, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 06:08:36PM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
> >>Both policy timer and hold_timer need to be deleted when destroy policy
> >>Bad mood today, maybe I'm wrong about this...
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Fan Du<fan.du@windriver.com>
> >>---
> >>  net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c |    2 +-
> >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> >>index d8da6b8..f7078eb 100644
> >>--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> >>+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> >>@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ void xfrm_policy_destroy(struct xfrm_policy *policy)
> >>  {
> >>  	BUG_ON(!policy->walk.dead);
> >>
> >>-	if (del_timer(&policy->timer))
> >>+	if (del_timer(&policy->timer) || del_timer(&policy->polq.hold_timer))
> >>  		BUG();
> >>
> >
> >The timers should be already deleted when xfrm_policy_destroy() is
> >called. This is just to check if that really happened and to
> >catch this bug if not. So it's not a bug fix, it just helps to
> >catch a potential bug. I'll consider to take this into ipsec-next
> >after some testing.
> >
> 
> On the contrary, please take a look at callers of xfrm_policy_destroy.
> Code flow is as below:
> 
>   xfrm_policy_alloc() /* setup timer/hold_timer here */ (1)
> 
>   /* do something with this policy, insert or something else */
> 
>   goto err; /* bail out if bad things happens */
> 
>   return ok
> 
> err:
>   xfrm_policy_destroy() /*So both timers in (1) need to be deleted */
> 

setup_timer() does not arm the timer, it just initializes the timer.
So the timer is not pending when xfrm_policy_destroy() is called
on error. The del_timer() in xfrm_policy_destroy() is really just
to catch a bug. That's also the reason why we call BUG() if we
delete a pending timer.

Anyway, applied to ipsec-next.

Thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2013-08-06  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-01 10:08 [PATCH net] xfrm: Delete hold_timer when destroy policy Fan Du
2013-08-01 12:01 ` Steffen Klassert
2013-08-02  1:22   ` Fan Du
2013-08-06  8:05     ` Steffen Klassert [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130806080506.GF25511@secunet.com \
    --to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fan.du@windriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).