From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] netfilter: implement netfilter SYN proxy Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:05:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20130807210540.GE32257@order.stressinduktion.org> References: <1375897371-18430-1-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net> <1375898766.4004.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130807205959.GC21463@macbook.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Eric Dumazet , pablo@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mph@one.com, jesper.brouer@gmail.com, as@one.com To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130807205959.GC21463@macbook.localnet> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:59:59PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 11:06:06AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > TCP timestamps are not really used, for various reasons ... > > > > Have you taken a look at > > > > > > No, not yet, will have a look. Not sure what you mean by "TCP timestamps > are not really used" though. I might be biased by usually only looking at > Linux traffic, but I was under that impression that everyone is using > TCP timestamps nowadays? We had a thread here on netdev: It seems, Windows stopped using tcp timestamps at least in windows 8 by default.