From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] 6lowpan: introduce lowpan_fetch_skb function Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:47:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20130814124754.GA2723@order.stressinduktion.org> References: <1376478108-3539-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com> <1376478108-3539-4-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com> <20130814114921.GC2010@order.stressinduktion.org> <520B7029.3070903@gmail.com> <20130814124545.GB4303@x61s.8.8.8.8> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Alexander Smirnov , dbaryshkov@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Aring Return-path: Received: from order.stressinduktion.org ([87.106.68.36]:51160 "EHLO order.stressinduktion.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932164Ab3HNMrz (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:47:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130814124545.GB4303@x61s.8.8.8.8> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:45:47PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > This was the old behaviour, we decide it to make it like this: > > fail = ... > fail |= .... > > if (fail) > ... > > We discussed that already at the linux-zigbee-devel mailinglist. > I don't know what I should do now, on linux-zigbee-devel we decide it to > this way, now we decide it in a other way... Oh, I didn't know. Please just take my mail as a suggestion. If there already was a discussion and you had a consensus about that please just ignore my mails. :) Thanks, Hannes