From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] macvtap: include all checksum offloads in TUN_OFFLOAD mask
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:44:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130815194420.GA11999@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520D2B60.2010503@redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:26:24PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 08/15/2013 03:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:09:45PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 02:45:30PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> >>>On 08/15/2013 02:24 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>>On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 01:02:52PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> >>>>>The features of the macvlan are based on the features of lower
> >>>>>device and thus can have checksum featurs other then IFF_F_HW_CSUM
> >>>>
> >>>>s/featurs/features/
> >>>>
> >>>>:set spell spelllang=en_us
> >>>>
> >>>>or whatever's the equivalent in your editor of choice.
> >>>>
> >>>>>set. However, TUN_OFFLOAD mask only includes IFF_F_HW_CSUM. Thus
> >>>>>when performing gso segmentation during macvtap_forward(),
> >>>>>it is possbile to end up with skbs that have ip_summed set
> >>>>>to CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. This is incorrect when the user
> >>>>>turns off checksum offloading.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Include all possible checksum offload values so that
> >>>>>we'll properly mask them off when performing GSO.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
> >>>>>---
> >>>>> drivers/net/macvtap.c | 2 +-
> >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> >>>>>index b51db2a..8121358 100644
> >>>>>--- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> >>>>>+++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> >>>>>@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static struct cdev macvtap_cdev;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> static const struct proto_ops macvtap_socket_ops;
> >>>>>
> >>>>>-#define TUN_OFFLOADS (NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO_ECN | NETIF_F_TSO | \
> >>>>>+#define TUN_OFFLOADS (NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO_ECN | NETIF_F_TSO | \
> >>>>> NETIF_F_TSO6 | NETIF_F_UFO)
> >>>>> #define RX_OFFLOADS (NETIF_F_GRO | NETIF_F_LRO)
> >>>>> /*
> >>>>
> >>>>Okay so you are talking about hardware that sets some other
> >>>>checksum bit besides HW_CSUM, e.g. IP_CSUM, so
> >>>>
> >>>> vlan->tap_features = vlan->dev->features &
> >>>> (feature_mask | ~TUN_OFFLOADS);
> >>>>
> >>>>will not clear IP_CSUM even if feature_mask is 0.
> >>>>
> >>>>Maybe mention this in the changelog, in case user
> >>>>will wonder whether his hardware is affected.
> >>>>
> >>>>So I agree, that's a bug, but if you make this change the reverse will hold
> >>>>(on this hardware):
> >>>>if user sets TUN_F_CSUM, we won't set NETIF_F_IP_CSUM
> >>>>so checksum offloading won't work.
> >>>>
> >>>>So I think you want s/NETIF_F_HW_CSUM/NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM/ everywhere
> >>>>and not just in this place.
> >>>
> >>>Yes. I thought about that, but forgot to do in this patch set.
> >>
> >>In fact I wonder why do we do it like this at all.
> >>tap_features have nothing to do with the device,
> >>they only have to do with tap.
> >>For example, you might have a dumb device with no
> >>checksum support but userspace said it does not need a checksum,
> >>we can have NETIF_F_HW_CSUM there anyway.
> >>
> >>So why don't we just
> >> vlan->tap_features = feature_mask;
> >>?
> >>In fact, this is exactly set_features, so why don't
> >>we just use set_features everywhere?
> >>Then this patch won't be needed at all.
> >>
> >>Kind of like this - compile-tested only - do you have a setup with
> >>IP_CSUM which you can use to test?
> >
> >Ugh this does not work even on a simple setup, sorry about the noise.
> >Maybe like this? Does this work for you?
> >
>
> No, this is really no different then what I had to start with.
>
> >-->
> >
> >macvtap: fix up tap features
> >
> >There's no apparent need to have tap features
> >masked according to the lowerdev config:
> >we only use them in software so hardware configuration
> >does not matter.
> >
> >This patch fixes bugs for some unusual hardware configurations,
> >for example, we only masked HW_CSUM so for hardware with
> >e.g. IP_CSUM the checksum bit remained set, which would cause
> >packets with CHECKSUM_PARTIAL to be sent to userspace
> >even when offloads are disabled.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> >
> >---
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> >index a98ed9f..3c18f12 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> >@@ -1058,8 +1058,7 @@ static int set_offload(struct macvtap_queue *q, unsigned long arg)
> > /* tap_features are the same as features on tun/tap and
> > * reflect user expectations.
> > */
> >- vlan->tap_features = vlan->dev->features &
> >- (feature_mask | ~TUN_OFFLOADS);
> >+ vlan->tap_features = feature_mask;
>
> This wouldn't work when tap_features = 0, since the skb features in
> forward would evaluate to 0. This means that netif_needs_gso() will
> return false and a GSO packet will be queued to the socket without
> going though segmentation.
>
> -vlad
>
Hmm won't same thing happen if features == 0 on lowerdev?
> > vlan->set_features = features;
> > netdev_update_features(vlan->dev);
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-15 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-15 17:02 [PATCH v3 0/2] Correctly perform offloads when VNET_HDR is disabled Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-15 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] macvtap: include all checksum offloads in TUN_OFFLOAD mask Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-15 18:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-15 18:45 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-15 18:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-15 19:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-15 19:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-15 19:26 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-15 19:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-08-15 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] macvtap: Allow tap features change when IFF_VNET_HDR is disabled Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-15 17:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-15 18:39 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-15 18:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-15 18:59 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-15 19:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-15 19:36 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-15 20:16 ` David Miller
2013-08-15 20:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-15 22:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130815194420.GA11999@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).